Aligment debate
Feb. 16th, 2006 07:32 amIf you ever played D&D, you probably remember alignments. You know - whether your character was Lawful and Good or else Chaotic but Neutral or whatever. And you probably remember arguments over whether or not an action was "according to your alignment" or the "alignment is a straightjacket" or "alignment is an aid to role-playing" arguments.
Order of the Stick posits, like other geeky gaming webcomics, a world that operates according to game rules. Including, in this case, alignment. And it goes on, amazingly, to look at how a court of law in world with knowable alignments might argue and operate. Those are the most nuanced and well-spoken words I've seen written in the Great Alignment Debate, and having been a member of not a few D&D GM forums, I've seen a lot of them.
Order of the Stick posits, like other geeky gaming webcomics, a world that operates according to game rules. Including, in this case, alignment. And it goes on, amazingly, to look at how a court of law in world with knowable alignments might argue and operate. Those are the most nuanced and well-spoken words I've seen written in the Great Alignment Debate, and having been a member of not a few D&D GM forums, I've seen a lot of them.