I'm a bit confused, though. Their sample-size is only 4 galaxies with GRBs. The Space.com article doesn't mention much about the non-GRB galaxies or how many GRBs/galaxy are detected. Sounds to me like the statistics are pretty shaky... but then maybe the original article does better than Space.com on that score.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 03:55 pm (UTC)-Sarah